By Yozshull - 25.02.2020
Wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton
WALL STREET. AND THE. BOLSHEVIK. REVOLUTION. By. Antony C. Sutton. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preface. Chapter I: The Actors on the Revolutionary Stage. Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution uncovers and documents the how the richest of the rich wall street bankers and business people funded the bolshevik.
Sutton p16 Both the extreme right and the extreme left of the conventional political spectrum are absolutely collectivist.Russian communists celebrate Bolshevik Revolution
The national socialist for example, the fascist and the international socialist for example, the Communist both recommend totalitarian politico-economic systems based on naked, unfettered political power and individual coercion.
Both systems require monopoly wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton of society. While monopoly control of industries was once the objective of J. Morgan and J.
Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums source Wall Street understood that the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to "go political" and make society go to work for the monopolists - under the name of the public good and the public interest.
They have superseded the teachings of our parents and are reducible to a simple maxim: Get a monopoly; let Society work for you: and remember that the best of all business is politics, for a legislative grant, franchise, subsidy or tax exemption is worth more than a Kimberly or Comstock lode, since it does not require any labor, either mental or physical, for its exploitation.
Under such https://obzortovar.ru/and/free-coin-and-spin-in-coin-master.html ordering the corporate welfare state and socialism are' at the same end of the spectrum. Hence we see that attempts at monopoly control of society can have different labels while owning common features.
This erroneous idea originated with Karl Marx and was undoubtedly useful to his purposes. In fact, the idea is nonsense. There has been a continuing, albeit concealed, alliance between international wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton capitalists and international revolutionary socialists - to their mutual benefit.
This alliance has gone unobserved largely because historians-with a few notable exceptions - have an wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton Marxian bias and are thus locked into the impossibility of any such alliance existing.
The open-minded reader should bear two clues in mind: monopoly capitalists are the bitter enemies of laissez-faire entrepreneurs; and, given the weaknesses of socialist central planning, the totalitarian socialist state is a perfect captive market for monopoly capitalists, if an alliance can link made with the socialist powerbrokers.
This alliance has gone unobserved largely because historians - with a few notable exceptions-have an unconscious Marxian bias and are thus locked into the impossibility of any such alliance existing.
Wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton, director, American International Corp. Rockefeller and Morgan trust alliances dominated not only Wall Street connect and unlock your ledger device, through interlocking directorships, almost the entire economic fabric of the United States.
Rockefeller interests monopolized the petroleum and allied industries, and wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton the copper trust, the smelters trust, and the gigantic tobacco trust, in addition to having influence in some Morgan properties such as the U.
Steel Corporation as well as in hundreds of smaller industrial trusts, public service operations, railroads, and banking institutions. The great Morgan enterprises were in steel, shipping, and the electrical industry; they included General Electric, the rubber trust, and railroads.
In the early part of the twentieth century the Guaranty Trust Company was dominated by the Harriman interests. In Morgan also bought control of Equitable Life, and the Guaranty Trust Company absorbed an additional six lesser trust companies.
Therefore, at the end continue reading World War I the Guaranty Trust and Bankers Trust were, respectively, the first and second largest trust companies in the United States, both dominated by Morgan interests.
Although the final gains of the syndicate remain unclear, the intention and role of the New York financing group https://obzortovar.ru/and/helix-coin-and-banknote-counter-tray.html fully documented down to amounts of money, information on affiliated Chinese secret societies, and shipping lists of armaments to be purchased.
In return for financial support, Sun Yat-sen promised the Hill syndicate railroad, banking, and commercial concessions in the new algorithmic and quantitative strategies China.
The Red Cross Morgan, Mrs. Harriman, Cleveland H. Dodge, and Mrs. Russell Sage. In fact, most of the money came from New York City. According to John Foster Dulles, these businessmen "viewed the American Red Cross as a virtual arm of government, they envisaged making an incalculable contribution to the winning of the war.
All expenses, including those of the uniforms-the members were all colonels, majors, captains, or lieutenants-were paid out of the pocket of William Boyce Thompson. The majority of the mission Wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton other explanation will explain the actions of source mission.
However, neither Thompson nor Robins was a Bolshevik. Nor was either even a consistent socialist. The writer is inclined to the interpretation that the socialist appeals of each man were covers for more prosaic hodlbot vs. Each man was intent this web page the wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton that is, each sought to use the political process in Russia for personal financial ends.
Whether the Russian people wanted the Bolsheviks was of no concern. Whether the Bolshevik regime would act against the United States - as it consistently did later - was of no concern.
The single overwhelming objective was to gain political and economic influence with the new regime, visit web page its ideology.
On May 1, - an auspicious date for Red revolutionaries - the American League to Aid and Cooperate with Russia was established and its program approved in a conference held in the Senate Office Building, Washington, Continue reading. The officers wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton executive committee of the league represented some superficially dissimilar factions.
Its president was Dr. Frank J. Goodnow, president of Johns Hopkins University. Straus, James Duncan, and Frederick C. Howe, who wrote 'Confessions of a Monopolist', the rule book by which monopolists could control society.
Search All 1 Records in Our Collections
Guaranty Trust used Olof Aschberg, the Bolshevik banker, as its intermediary in Russia before and after the revolution. And in mid Guaranty was the Soviet fiscal agent in wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton U. This duplicity raises, of course, serious questions about the intentions of Guaranty Trust and its directors.
Dealing with the Soviets, even backing them, can be explained by apolitical greed or simply profit motive. On the other hand, spreading propaganda designed to create fear and panic while at the see more time encouraging the conditions that give rise to the fear and panic is a considerably more serious problem.
Moreover, Russia, then and now, constituted the greatest potential competitive threat to American industrial and financial supremacy. A glance at a world map is sufficient to spotlight the geographical difference between the vast land mass of Russia and the smaller United States. Wall Street must have cold shivers when it visualizes Russia as a second super American industrial giant.
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution
But why allow Russia to become a competitor and a challenge to U. In the late nineteenth century, Morgan, Rockefeller, and Guggenheim had demonstrated their monopolistic proclivities.
In Railroads and Regulation Wall street and the bolshevik cryptocurrency and fidelity by antony c sutton Kolko has demonstrated how the railroad owners, not the farmers, wanted state control of railroads in order to preserve their monopoly and abolish competition.
Wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton the simplest explanation of our evidence is that a syndicate wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton Wall Street financiers enlarged their monopoly ambitions and broadened horizons on a global scale.
The gigantic Russian market was to be converted into a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control.
What the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade Commission under the thumb of American industry could achieve for that industry at home, a planned socialist government could achieve for it abroad. The question wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton in the readers' minds must be, were these bankers also secret Bolsheviks?
News, Opinions & Analysis that Matters
No, of course not. The financiers were without ideology. It would be a gross misinterpretation to assume that assistance for the Bolshevists was ideologically motivated, in any narrow sense.
The financiers were power-motivated and therefore assisted any political vehicle that would give them an entree to power: Trotsky, Lenin, the tsar, Kolchak, Denikin - all received aid, more or less. All, that is, but those who wanted a truly free individualist society.
Neither was aid restricted to statist Bolsheviks and statist counter-Bolsheviks. John P. Head of the powerful J. Morgan banking network, Lamont served as something of a business consultant for the government of Fascist Italy. Wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton suggests premeditation for [a] kind of superficial schizophrenia, which in https://obzortovar.ru/and/what-is-reddit-gold-and-platinum.html masks an integrated program of power acquisition: "What then if Carnegie and his unlimited wealth, the wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton financiers and the Socialists could be organized in a movement to compel the formation of a league to enforce peace.
Lord Miler wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton England provides the transatlantic example of banking interests recognizing the virtues and possibilities of Marxism. Miler was a banker, influential in British wartime policy, and proMarxist.
Inwhen A. Barton Hepburn, president of Chase National Bank, was president of the Economic Club, the main speaker was the aforementioned Morris Hillquit, who "had abundant opportunity to preach socialism to a gathering which represented wealth ,J and financial interests.
Trotsky was not pro-Russian, or pro-Allied, or pro-German, as many have tried to make unlimited spin and in coin out to be.
Trotsky was for wall street and the bolshevik revolution by antony c sutton revolution or world dictatorship; he was, in one word, an internationalist.! Bolshevists and bankers have significant common ground - internationalism.
Revolution and international finance are not at all inconsistent if the result of revolution is to establish more centralized authority. International finance prefers to deal with central governments.
The last thing the banking community wants is laissez-faire economy and decentralized power because these would disperse power. Above all else these men wanted markets, preferably captive international markets-and a monopoly of the captive world market as the ultimate goal.
They wanted markets that could be exploited monopolistically without fear of competition from Russians, Germans, or anyone else-including American businessmen outside the charmed circle.
This closed group was apolitical and amoral. Init had a single-minded objective-a captive market in Russia, all presented under, and intellectually protected by, the shelter of a league to enforce the peace. Wall Street did indeed achieve its goal.
American firms controlled by this syndicate were later to go on and build the Soviet Union, and today are well on their way to bringing the Soviet military-industrial complex into the age of the computer. Today the objective is still alive and well. John D. Rockefeller expounds it in his book The Second American Revolution In other words, a plea for collectivism.
Humanism is collectivism. It is notable that the Rockefellers, who have promoted this humanistic idea for a century, have not turned their OWN property over to others. Presumably it is implicit in their recommendation that we all work for the Difference between cryptocurrency and forex trading. Rockefeller's book promotes collectivism under the guises of "cautious conservatism" and "the public good.
- 100x leverage crypto reddit
- 1 satoshi is equal to how many bitcoin
- slushpool worker password
- binance india jobs
- best indicators for day trading mt4
- vcash coinomi
- coinify review
- petro canada apple wallet
- iota buy or sell
- nitro pdf pro
- best crypto to invest in september 2020
- can neosporin help with acne
- this code must be redeemed in the u s storefront
- c generate bitcoin address